“…no thought for the morrow…”

Snowflakes stuck to “Old Turkey Feathers’” barrel, yet the Northwest gun remained still. The small six-ponter stepped closer and closer, cross-wind, eighteen paces distant, on the mid-trail, down a steep slope. Large white flakes drifted earthward in the calm gray of first light. Crystalline beauty coated the crimson, four-point wool trade blanket, which smelled of wet sheep. My eyes squinted. My nose dripped. On that magnificent December morn, in the Year of our Lord, 1794, a first-year, unsuspecting white-tailed buck flirted with death, but passed unscathed.

A six-point buck walking in the snow.A solitary blue jay flitted by. In due time, a fox squirrel with bristled-up hair materialized from a dried-leaf nest tucked high in a slender red oak that grew next to the trail the young buck chose. This creature spiraled out of sight. My eyes glanced about as I looked for another deer, then returned to the oak.

The squirrel reappeared on the tree’s left main branch, scurrying upward. The limbs became thinner. With a mighty leap that flexed a wispy twig and a flash of tawny underbelly, the fox squirrel jumped to a bigger red oak. It stayed atop the branches, sending snow flying. At a bend in a thigh-sized limb, it seemed to slip. Its hind end and bushy tail scooted south. Its pace slowed before vanishing from sight once again.

No deer moved, but neither did the fox squirrel. Snow filtered through the barren branches overhead in a soul-soothing shower. A large flake came to rest on the Northwest gun’s turtle sight. An eternity later, the squirrel circled ‘round the trunk, well up and just below the first main limbs. It hung head down, looked to the east, then west, and barked thrice. The scratch of its little claws filled the forest’s silence as it edged lower, then hung again.

Satisfied no present danger existed, the fox squirrel jumped into the fresh, deep snow as a sleek otter dives beneath a tranquil beaver pond’s glassy surface. It emerged in an explosion of white, bounded twice then burrowed like a mole in soft earth. Not more than ten paces distant, the squirrel burst forth and sat upright with a constant flicking of its bushy tail and a steady chatter that all could hear.

The squirrel bent forward. Leaf-parts flew and settled on the snow behind it. It turned east and dug again, then burrowed ahead a foot or so and began searching anew. A half-dozen times the fox squirrel dove into the snow, dug in earnest, then moved on. All motion stopped. The bushy tail twitched twice, then the squirrel sat upright with an un-capped acorn clutched between its front paws. It chattered again, loud and long, then started cutting on the nut that rolled over and over in its tiny claws.

In time, the search resumed. The screech of a distant red-tailed hawk put an end to the diving, burrowing and excavating. The squirrel ran to the nest oak with steady bounds. It spiraled up that trunk and disappeared, only to reappear on the thinner branches that led to the dried-leaf nest…

Similarities between then and now

The historical me that portrays a backwoods hunter for a small trader’s post near the headwaters of the River Raisin tucks a copy of the New Testament in his deerskin hunting bag. In the early years I made a hand-sewn linen envelope for this Bible. One day I took an unplanned swim in the swamp. The hunting bag got wet, but the contents didn’t. That wilderness classroom lesson resulted in a new perspective for how I stow valuable accoutrements.

The unwrapped bible laying on the hunting bag.Not long after, I stitched up a deerskin envelope for the New Testament and the first linen cover. When I traded for a burning glass, the lens fit in the cloth pouch, and the outer deerskin pouch provided additional protection. I’ve carried the New Testament and Psalms that way ever since.

I don’t pull the New Testament out and read from it as much as I should, but on that morning I did, despite the falling snow. I held the hand-sized book close so melting snow would not damp the pages. As I sat watching the fox squirrel seek that day’s sustenance, my thoughts turned to matters other than deer hunting.

I keep a cutting of brown silk ribbon marking “The Sermon on the Mount” in Matthew’s Gospel. My being, both modern and historical, is drawn to what used to be called “the lilies of the field” passage. The newer translation lacks the rhythmic eloquence of the old, at least for me. My late wife, Mary, loved those brief verses, and there is an 18th-century connection, too.

This past weekend, the “lilies of the field” passage was the Gospel reading at church. The message lingered in the back recesses of my mind. I remembered that December morning and the fox squirrel burrowing in the snow—funny how a living historian’s mind associates 21st-century happenstances with events of a bygone era. This passage is several verses long, so for brevity I will touch on the basics as they apply to my hunter heroes:

“Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?” (New Testament, Matt: 6, 25)

“…Consider the lilies of the field, and how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these…” (Ibid, 28 – 29)

“…But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.” (Ibid, 33 – 34)

A young George Nelson signed on as a fur trading clerk for the XY Company. Nelson had never been away from home, and as a result, his journal contains some poignant passages. I depend on his writings, along with those of several other traders and clerks, for guidance with my trading post hunter persona.

“We left all behind, on Stages, covered from the weather, & entered the woods on the East Side of Riviere des Sauteux, taking our Course for the Wees-kon-sin, thro’ a thick forest. We took a slight breakefast & left the remainder of our provisions behind, observing the precept in this perhaps solitary instance ‘every day will provide for itself.’ Our Guides Son, a lad about 20 was out a hunting; and as he did not join us, his mother took an axe & beat for a long time upon a large hollow stump. The next morning he rejoined us. I do not now remember what it was that kept him back. We had proceeded but a short distance when saw a Deer bounding across the woods before us. A Shot or two deprived him of his existence, tho’ flying as it were, & provided for ours. I may say it was not yet quite dead before some of our party had eaten it—so expeditions were we!” (Nelson, 126)

On the returned white captive side, James Smith was 18 years old when he was taken captive and adopted in 1755. Smith had a Bible, and references it on several occasions in his narrative. At one point, he loaned his copy to Arthur Campbell, an adopted captive residing in a Wyandot village on Lake Erie. Smith wrote:

“During his stay at Sunyendeand he borrowed my Bible, and made some pertinent remarks on what he had read. One passage was where it is said, ‘It is good for man that he bear the yoke in his youth.’ He said we ought to be resigned to the will of Provikence [sic], as we were now bearing the yoke, in our youth. (Smith, 64)

Smith went on to reference the “take therefore no thought for the morrow” passage:

“…we had either green corn or venison, and sometimes both—which was comparatively, high living. When we could have plenty of green corn, or roasting-ears, the hunters became lazy, and spent their time as already mentioned, in singing and dancing &c. They appeared to be fulfilling the scriptures beyond those who profess to believe them, in that of taking no thought for to-morrow; and also in living in love, peace and friendship together, without disputes. In this respect, they shame those who profess Christianity.” (Ibid, 65)

As the old adage says, “The more times change, the more they stay the same.”

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Deer Hunts, Persona, Worth thinking about... | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “…no thought for the morrow…”

“Crossing Through Time’s Portal”

“Snapshot Saturday”

Two traditional woodsman walking a path into the wilderness.

Somewhere along the trail, the two woodsmen crossed through time’s portal and stepped back into the late 18th century. The transition, personal and unique to each historical persona, took place at different moments. Both wandered around the bend with moccasins placed firm in the 1790s. Old Northwest Territory not far from the Cut River and Marl Lake.

Posted in Snapshot Saturday, Squirrel Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Wild Turkey Music at Sunrise”

“Snapshot Saturday”

Looking past a lady of the woods and taking in a gorgeous sunrise.

A lady of the woods faced east. The oranges and lavenders of a gorgeous sunrise filter through the cedar trees. Eighty paces to the north, several gravel-mouthed hens clucked from their night roost, filling the cedars with wild turkey music. Old Northwest Territory, in the Year of our Lord, 1795.

Posted in Snapshot Saturday, Turkey Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “Wild Turkey Music at Sunrise”

“That won’t work on an actual hunt…”

First light ushered in a volley of musket fire. The muzzle blasts, five in all, echoed up and down the River Raisin. A minute or so later, a second unsettling exchange erupted well to the north—four shots, a pause, then two…then three blasts. On that humble morn, in the Year of our Lord, 1794, a sense of immediate urgency gripped the hardwoods and the bottomlands.

Not long before, at the bend in the trail, loud geese ke-honked off to the west near the river’s lily-pad flats. Night’s last gasp was underway. Buffalo-hide moccasins whispered over the hill, around the next gentle curve and down the slope. The eastern horizon grayed. At the first shot all fell silent as the returned white captive hustled to the shelter of an ancient red oak’s huge trunk. Thirty or so minutes ticked away, ample time to resume a humble prayer with Gzhe-mi-ni-doo, the Great Creator.

With care and caution the still-hunt continued. The tips of two ears flicked. A butterfly-breath of cool air swayed a tall, yellowing blade of grass. The deer was cross wind. Its ears twitched east, then west. The antlerless head disappeared, then reappeared a few steps to the west as the woodsman stood behind a shag bark hickory and simply watched.

Msko-waagosh watching from behind a dead red oak tree.The faint sound of rustling leaves accompanied the deer’s body as it stepped into view. It pawed beneath a stout red oak, itched behind its left ear with its hind hoof and nipped fish-shaped greenery from an autumn olive bush. In due time it wandered off into the little valley and then up and over the rise. “Mii-gwech Gzhe-mi-ni-doo,” the woodsman whispered, acknowledging thanks for the blessing of happening upon the young doe.

“Scu-reeeeee…Scu-reeeeee!” A red-tailed hawk cried out as it circled overhead. “Jay! Jay! Jay!” a vigilant blue jay responded. Geese again ke-honked on the Raisin. Perhaps they would go silent or spread a warning if a British patrol or a company of rangers from Fort Detroit materialized on the river’s west bank?

“Kee-honk, yonk, yonk…kee-honk, yonk…” A sizeable wedge of Canada geese winged east to west, but as it flew over the east-bank’s bottoms, the geese veered north and rose higher. Dark, trail-worn moccasins and blue wool leggins edged north, then angled a tad to the east. A large cedar tree, encircled with brush and debris, awaited in a little sequestered hollow. That familiar lair offered a commanding view of the north boundary of the nasty thicket.

Thick, brittle, fluffy leaves littered the forest floor. A chipping sparrow could not approach without causing a formidable ruckus. Fingers dug in the buckskin pouch. A cream-colored wing bone, polished from years of faithful service, emerged. The flat end rested on dry lips. Two tugs of air sent two soft clucks out over the thicket. The wing bone returned to the pouch. The Northwest gun’s muzzle eased to the center of the little valley. An anxious thumb traced lazy circles on the cock’s domed screw…

The Evolution of the ‘Smoothbore Bag’

Last fall I fielded a request for a specific photo to illustrate another outdoor writer’s article on shooting black powder woodswalks. I have an extensive photo library, gathered over the years. Someone suggested he contact me, and I obliged—anything to promote the black powder shooting sports. I don’t know if he submitted my photos, but I had a great time rummaging through the pictures.

At one of the larger winter woodswalks, the club color codes their stations for rifles, pistols and smoothbores in an attempt to match the challenge to the chosen arm. Thus a pistol shooter is not required to shoot a teensy rifle target that is out there 100-plus yards. To some extent, the same applies to the smoothbores.

When I was done with the search, I returned to the photos for the two smoothbore groups I followed that day. I studied each image, paying close attention to the loading methods and bag set ups of the shooters. The more I looked, the more I remember feeling like an outcast.

The interest in smoothbores has grown over the last ten years. In the mid-1980s, when I first ventured to Friendship, Indiana, the home of the National Muzzle Loading Rifle Association, only a handful of shooters competed with smoothbores. Most of those folks were re-enactors who actually shot round balls and birdshot out of their weekend guns—but only at paper targets, clangors or clay pigeons. Few people hunted with smoothbores, and fewer dressed in traditional attire.

Today almost everyone shoots a smoothbore, which is the reason behind that club color-coding their stations. The forums and social media are filled with newcomers’ requests for information on shooting smoothbores, as are the muzzleloading magazines and video channels. Post a written response, or better yet, a video of how you load your trade gun or what you keep in your “smoothbore bag” and you are an instant celebrity and a renowned expert.

A long-time traditional hunter and I often discuss the current trends we see in the various media outlets, witness at shooting events, or to some degree, view at re-enactments. Of late, the growing size of smoothbore bags, coupled with the expansion of intricacies of loading a smooth-bored muzzleloader (I’m talking more complicated than “powder-patch-ball” in a rifle) take up a greater portion of our conversations. In the end, the comment is always the same: “That won’t work on an actual hunt.”

In essence, a woodswalk or line shoot and a traditional black powder hunt are two different endeavors. Yet, I see more and more living historians carting these smoothbore duffle bags across time’s threshold. At the risk of ruffling some feathers, I feel compelled to ask, “Where is the primary documentation?”

Now, as a traditional black powder hunter, I answer only for the historical me and the items I believe are an appropriate representation of that composite individual. It is my responsibility to research primary documentation to validate those choices. Thus, the majority of my accoutrements are based on existing museum artifacts and/or actual first-person passages taken from the writings of my hunter heroes.

A deerskin shot pouch fashioned after an Ottawa original.But there are situations where intrusions require a dash of measured compromise, which “stretches” the documentation/truth. For example, I carry a brass powder measure, because of modern safe loading practices. I can find no documentation for such a measure in any of the captive narratives, and it is my opinion that the vast majority of returned captives did not carry a measure in the 1790s.

With that in mind, I am learning to “palm powder.” Through my experimentation in the wilderness classroom, I am close to being able to measure out a consistent charge of black powder without the aid of a metal, horn or antler measuring device. This method satisfies the safety concerns and approximates what I believe Tanner and others did in real life. I will address this in a more complete post at another time.

Likewise, I have a small deerskin pouch with a bit of tow and two gun worms, which I use to clean “Old Turkey Feathers.” The primary documentation doesn’t seem to support either the little pouch or the tow, but I’m solid with the gun worms. Again, I’m experimenting with using grass and other natural-occurring fibers in place of tow to swab the bore. As I said above, “film at 11…”

The direction of my research is toward reducing the amount of items carried in my deerskin shot pouch, not adding to them. This is why I feel like an outcast; I am moving in the opposite direction of the mainstream and my 7-inch by 7-inch buckskin pouch keeps getting thinner and thinner.

The goal is to experience the simple pursuit of wild game under the same conditions and restrictions as John Tanner, Jonathan Alder and James Smith did. If I can limit myself to what they carried, I can better understand what it was like to live, hunt and survive in the Old Northwest Territory of the Lower Great Lakes.

And here is the big difference from the trends that I am seeing: each change is made after careful testing under actual hunting conditions within an historical simulation that is as close as possible to the wilderness of the 1790s. Thus, as I so often find myself saying, “That won’t work on an actual hunt.”

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Clothing & Accoutrements, Living History, Research, Turkey Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

“River Bottom Buck”

“Snapshot Saturday”

A traditional woodsman with a fine buck.

The buck came up out of the tamaracks around a tiny hidden lake and crossed in front of a traditional hunter with German lineage. The French ‘D’ trade gun thundered, the death sphere hit its mark and the buck ran into the River Raisin’s bottom land. Old Northwest Territory, sometime in the 1780s…

Posted in Deer Hunts, Living History, Snapshot Saturday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

It’s All Based on Experience

Grayed, brittle branches offered scant cover. That red cedar tree toppled eastward many winters before; a heavy wet snow uprooted it. Back then the boughs were thick and lush and provided a formidable palisade. A few judicious whacks with a sharp-edged tomahawk cut an ample nest. Again, on a cold December morn, a brisk northwest wind necessitated a second chopping on that tree’s opposite side.

The following spring the death bees swarmed from the first lair; a fine, long-bearded tom turkey died that morning. An old hen met her demise in early November; the year escapes me right now. The upturned roots, still packed with sandy soil, hid a trading post hunter’s entire body, all but the Northwest gun’s muzzle.

A few years later, in the midst of a snowy deer hunt, eighteen or so wild turkeys surrounded the tree. Tamara sat in the north hollow and I in the south. The bronze beauties had nary a clue death lurked so close. After pecking a while, they circled south and flew up to roost. Big wings flailed and thrashed, lost feathers floated and one or two squawked their displeasure when we stood up. We both laughed and neither of us will ever forget that night.

Oh, and two falls ago a dandy buck with a broken left beam rubbed a stout autumn olive branch bare, then angled uphill through the thick cedars that pepper that little knob. Between the roll of the hill and the placement of trees, the trade gun’s tarnished butt plate never rose.

On that morning in 1795, trail-worn winter moccasins shuffled on in darkness. The root ball’s dirt was washed away, the trunk had settled to the ground and the dead branches no longer aided a hunter’s purpose.

The bedroll plopped down beside a large cedar, maybe a dozen paces downhill from the old haunt. “Gob-obl-obl-obl! A single, abbreviated gobble resonated up the knoll as I sat cross-legged against the cedar.

A few minutes later a hen spoke from a roost tree not that far to the south, “Ark, ark, ark, ark.” Another answered to the north, and I found myself thinking about that snow squall in November and all those birds pecking around us. As it grew lighter, a turkey’s silhouette appeared to the east. Its head fidgeted from side-to-side and up-and-down as it tried to evaluate the blanket-clad lump that sat beside the cedar tree.

A traditional woodsman sits with his back to a large cedar tree.Upwind, ears flipped just over the rise. The antlerless deer seemed in no hurry. The ears dropped, and in a matter of seconds popped up again. A second pair of ears joined the first. Both deer lingered in that spot for about fifteen minutes before vanishing.

In time an older doe and two yearlings walked north on the lower trail. The three slipped behind a massive, fallen oak limb that still held its browned summer leaves. The last deer kept glancing back. The Northwest gun’s muzzle eased in her direction.

The three re-appeared. I watched them out of the corner of my eye as I divided my glances between where I had seen the first doe and where the lower trail emerged from behind the rise.

A short while later, another pair of ears flipped and flicked. This deer sported two slender, forked beams, each curving upward perhaps eight inches. This young buck did not linger. In a handful of heartbeats, he dogged the lower trail with his shiny black nose just above the earthen ribbon.  He moved with a slight air of caution and stopped four times, each offering a doable shot for “Old Turkey Feathers.”

Perhaps forty minutes later, the scenario repeated itself. This young stag had a three-point beam on his right side and a stub broken off just up from his left brow tine. His movements matched those of the fork-horn, but when he appeared on the lower trail, his pace quickened, presenting only one shooting opportunity before passing behind the brushy oak limb.

The buck paused, shrouded behind the mass of curled brown leaves. If not for a twitchy left hind leg visible through an opening in the tangle, a woodsman might have thought this buck turned east and disappeared in the big swamp’s sedge grass. The pause seemed temporary, but provided enough time for that same woodsman to turn his body in anticipation of a shot, if he so desired.

Minutes fell like autumn leaves, enough so that there was no question something was amiss, at least in that buck’s mind. I wondered if he sensed my presence or scented a wayward whiff. When he advanced he did so with great caution, broadside chance after broadside chance. Thirty paces distant from the limb, the trail jogs west a bit. He stopped there, raised his snout high and jerked it up-and-down, indicating the reason for his concern. In time he put his nose to the trail and walked on.

Studying Wilderness Opportunities

Discussions of late have centered on deer hunting. A number of times the questions gravitated to knowing when to take a shot. I find it interesting how thought patterns seem to flow along similar lines. I often wonder if the impetus for such inquiries is a post on one of the social media, a magazine article or television show or if the commonality of a given subject is spontaneous.

The adage that jumps out of my mouth is: “Your first shot is your best shot.” Now there are two ways to look at that statement, the first being, “make your first shot count,” and the second being, “take the first good shot.”

In both instances the unsung hero in the advice is experience. On the surface, hunters, modern and traditional, interpret “experience” as actually taking a shot and learning from the resulting consequences of that shot. For me, as a traditional black powder hunter, that is not the case. By viewing the glade as a wilderness classroom, every encounter with game is a learning experience, or should be.

Of course, the first consideration is the woodsman’s ability coupled with the limitations of his or her chosen black powder arm. After determining an “effective distance,” one must factor in the probability of completing a clean and humane shot placement. The closer the shot is, the higher the probability of success.  Balanced against this is the reality that the closer the game gets, the greater the chance of being scented or detected. And once again, the discussion returns to actual experience as a deciding factor.

A mature doe, hidden by a cedar tree, glances to the east.Setting aside deer that approach or will pass downwind of a chosen lair, the goal of any traditional woodsman is to become an active tenant of the forest. In essence, each tenant goes about its own business without hampering or spooking the other tenants. So when the first deer’s ears told of its presence, the challenge for me was to go unnoticed by my peers—those deer. Over the course of their passing, I achieved that goal.

Now years ago, I took this task to a different level, at least on a somewhat selective basis. As deer entered “Old Turkey Feathers’” effective distance, like the various deer that morning, I would mount the trade gun and watch over the barrel as the creatures passed. As they came closer, I decided which shot or shots were “the best,” and I did the same as they left my area. If the deer slipped by unaware, I achieved my goal, and if they didn’t, well, I learned a valuable lesson.

I no longer follow this practice, because I don’t need to. I understand the problems of getting the smoothbore up, moving with the deer and picking the best shot. Yet, as on that morning, I still evaluate every move every time I encounter deer or turkeys or squirrels. In so doing, I spook my share of critters, and definitely more than hunters perched in a tree or sitting in a people box.

This practice is a version of my game of “Spies and Scouts,” but that will have to wait for another post. The point that I try to make is learning when to take a shot is an ongoing woodland experience. The lessons are out there, and they start the minute game is spotted and they don’t end until that game passes through or runs off. There is nothing magical about it, no mystic formula is involved—it is all based on experience.

The same lessons hold true for deer passing downwind of the woodsman’s humble ambuscade. Knowing where one’s scent is traveling is an acquired skill, founded in trial and error learning in the wilderness classroom. Scent currents follow different paths in different locations. On that hillside, the large cedar tree where I sat is more “scent neutral” than the oak that is ten paces to the east—again, learned by experience.

In this situation, the trick is to balance the effective distance against the deer’s approach against the point where scent detection is probable. The result of this evaluation process is the selection of a location for taking that first, best shot. The key is to view each encounter as a classroom exercise, rather than sitting and waiting for the deer to pass and gaining no new knowledge.

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you

Posted in Deer Hunts, Skills, Wilderness Classroom | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

“A Ranger’s Pause”

“Snapshot Saturday”

A ranger pauses behind a large oak tree

A ranger with Hopkin’s Company of Rangers, garrisoned at Fort Detroit, uses a large oak tree for cover during a wild turkey hunt. Pontiac’s Siege, in the Year of our Lord, 1763

Posted in Persona, Snapshot Saturday, Turkey Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

“Walking in at Sunrise”

“Snapshot Saturday”

A lady of the woods silhouetted against an orange sunrise.

A lady of the woods walks around a large cedar tree as she approaches a dead oak at the west edge of a pleasant meadow. An hour after the sun rose above the tree line, a flock of wild turkeys pecked their way out into the meadow, just beyond her trade gun’s effective distance. Old Northwest Territory, east of the River Raisin, in the Year of our Lord, 1795.

Posted in Persona, Snapshot Saturday, Turkey Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “Walking in at Sunrise”