A Lack of Credible Provenance

Wet leaves dampened forest sounds. Buffalo-hide moccasins uttered nary a whisper. Misty-gray sprinkles hushed that morning’s calm in an eerie, church cemetery fashion. The air smelled of wiggly worms, rotting deer leavings and wet-dog oak wood. The taste of smoked and salted venison jerk lingered on the tongue. It was the second day of May, in the Year of our Lord, 1793.

A solitary hen turkey clucked once at first light, high up in a slender red oak tree on the northeast corner of Fox Hill. The soft, scratchy “Arrkkk” ended quick and abrupt, leaving the impression the bird realized it had spoken in error. Nothing responded. Even the six Canada geese that winged over remained silent; the swish of their dark wings could not be heard, either.

An hour or so after day’s dawning, I scrambled to my feet, slung the bedroll over my shoulder and struck off to the north. That still-hunt skirted the nasty thicket, avoided the big scrape, then dropped into the valley filled with wild cherry saplings. A long pause before breaking over the saddle-rise allowed a single white-tailed deer, a yearling doe, to wander off to the east.

In time, the rolled-blanket, bound with a leather portage collar, found respite in a fork of a fallen oak top that still held most of its brown leaves. Once settled in to this new fortress, an index finger found the single radius wing bone in the bottom seam of the shot pouch. I dug it out, then rolled the cream-colored tube back and forth between my thumb and finger as I silently debated, “Do I call, or don’t I?”

A while later, off to the east and over the ridge, a hen clucked twice. A high-pitched gobble answered: “Gob-obl-obl-obl-obl-obl!” A deeper-toned gobble responded to the next sequence of four stern clucks.

A traditional woodsman clucking on a single wing bone call.The wing bone still rested between my fingers, but little doubt remained as to what course to embark upon. With the bone to my lips, I kissed out four seductive, “come-hither” clucks. The sound hung about the treetop and lingered in the silence of the River Raisin’s bottom lands, which concerned me. “Perhaps I sucked too strong, clucked too loud, too bold,” I wondered. The hardwoods returned to their damp, eerie gloom, which deepened my misgivings.

In due time my shoulders settled back against a limb’s rough bark. Song birds flitted about, but none spoke. Sandhill cranes winged over, then a string of eleven geese, all quiet. Another doe wandered by. A red-tailed hawk circled west. A lone fox squirrel spiraled down a shag-bark hickory, up on the little rise before the ridge crest. I fought the urge to move on.

A wild turkey’s head popped up by a leaning red oak. The gray pate disappeared. A dozen steps to the north, the head herky-jerked into sight. A fan opened, then turned about in a tight pirouette. When the spread tail feathers blocked the bird’s view, I pulled the Northwest gun to my armpit, raised my left knee and steadied the smooth-bored trade gun on that knee, as I had done so many times before.

The turkey took a few steps, fanned and danced, then paused as it waited for the mystery hen to show herself. Minutes piled up into a solid half hour. The short-bearded tom’s advance had not yet brought it to the shag-bark hickory, sixty-plus paces distant. After a double pirouette, the bird folded its tail, slicked down its feathers and marched in my direction. “A clean kill, or a clean miss. Your will, O Lord,” I prayed in silence.

Partway down the knoll’s gentle slope, the tom stopped beside a hollow sassafras tree. The mime’s ballet continued, first with a spin to the right, then another to the left, followed by a long pause in full display. Never once did that turkey gobble, spit or putt, at least not that I could hear.

By flexing the trigger as my thumb pulled the sharp English flint back, I eased the sear into the tumbler’s full-cock notch without the telltale click. In the middle of the next pirouette, the trade gun’s butt stock pressed into my right shoulder, but twenty paces separated the death bees from the moment of truth…

Two Single Wing Bone Turkey Calls

A glass-covered oak case sat on a small table situated in a dead space created by a jog in the cement block wall. A hand-lettered sign read: “Not for Sale. Display Only.”

On first glance, this display case’s contents seemed quite ordinary. It held a couple of fire steels, a folding knife, an antler-handled fork and knife set and a few other frontier artifacts. Then I did a double take, bent forward and tried to regain normal breathing. On the left side, just below center, an open tin spectacle case held two radius turkey wing bones and a bone-handled awl.

Two wing bones and an awl in a tin case.Tami and I were attending the 6th Annual Indian Art & Frontier Antiques Show at the Washtenaw Farm Council Fairgrounds, south and west of Ann Arbor, Michigan. Four inquiries later I found the owner, who was reluctant to make any definitive statements about the eyeglass case and/or its contents. I was not surprised. What could he say? He bought the rusted tin container from an antique dealer who said it might have come from a Native American family estate. There was simply no credible provenance. “The wing bones were probably turkey calls, but that’s a guess on my part,” he said.

I did not handle the case or the bones; I treated them with great respect as one would any museum artifact. Holding a measuring tape close, the longer bone was about 4 1/2 inches and the smaller 3 7/8 inches. My impression was that the longer one came from a tom and the smaller from a hen—this assumption matches tom and hen radius bones in my possession. And from experience, I know that different length radius bones give different pitched tones.

Both wing bones were smooth from handling and appeared to be well used. The end of the longer bone opposite the flatter, “mouth-piece” end, had a clear cut line and both ends showed a ragged break, leaving the impression the ends were scored with a knife and the joint snapped off when the bone was fresh and green.

The owner thought the glass case was mid- to late-19th century, but a search found three similar eyeglass cases with the same style hinge and latch attributed to the late-18th century. One had a red-paint interior finish, and there were clear indications of red paint on the lid and back corner of this case. In addition, a stained and faded piece of olive-green, heavy-weave fabric covered the bottom of the tin. Did the owner want to muffle the rattling sound of the bones and awl?

And looking at the outside corners of the tin led one to think the eyeglass case was carried inside a soft-sided container—a shot pouch or perhaps a hunting coat’s pocket? Unfortunately, without some explanation from the original owner/user of this case, all of these questions, impressions or inferences amount to nothing more than speculation. No one can say for sure when the wing bones, awl and/or fabric were placed in the case or by whom or why.

What I can attest to is that I started using a single radius wing bone as a wild turkey call almost two decades ago. I switched from a box call when I discovered wing bones were dug up in the 1940s at the Eva archeological site in Tennessee. Workers were constructing the dam for Kentucky Lake at the time, and the excavations produced a number of wing bone yelper turkey calls, some single bones, some two bone calls, some radius/antler combinations and some radius/wood or cane calls.

The single bone calls caught my attention so I began experimenting in the wilderness classroom. I reasoned that after I mastered enticing turkeys with a single bone, I could move on to study the various combinations. As I said, I learned that different length bones give different tones, and for this reason, I sometimes carry two radius bones, one hen and one tom.

Other than the information about the Eva archeological site, I have never seen a single radius wing bone in a museum, illustration or mentioned in any narrative or journal. The exception to that statement is that Lewis Wetzel once made a turkey call from a “drum-stick bone” and “a piece of quill.” (Allman, 123) Yet despite the lack of credible provenance, you can imagine my elation with the discovery of the tin eyeglass case and its mysterious contents.

Oh, and you’re wondering about the short-bearded tom? He danced and fanned for another half hour. He never came closer, and he never uttered a sound. In the end, he folded his tail feathers and walked back over the ridge with a distinct air of disgust. Sometimes woodland caution is a potent antidote for love sickness.

A modern hunter with a diaphragm-style mouth call would have brought him in range, especially in range of a turkey-choked shotgun stoked with magnum plastic suppositories (I still think they are a fad and will never catch on). A hen decoy would have sealed the deal, too.

But that May morning’s time traveling adventure was set in 1793 and limited to the resources my hunter heroes had to work with—a single wing bone call, a downed oak top and a cylinder-bored trade gun. The actions required to set the Northwest gun down on my knee, pull out the call, put it to my mouth and draw a few love notes—well, the end result would have been the same as if I would have stood up and said, “Stay put, I’ll come to you…”

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Clothing & Accoutrements, Turkey Hunts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Lack of Credible Provenance

“Tracking in the Snow”

“Snapshot Saturday”

A French hunter tracking a deer across a swamp.

A French hunter for the garrison at Fort Pontchartrain du Detroit tracked a fine doe in the midst of a snow squall. The day after Christmas, two ridges east of the headwaters of La Riviere aux Raisins, in the Year of our Lord, 1755.

Posted in Deer Hunts, Snapshot Saturday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “Tracking in the Snow”

“End of the Morning Hunt”

“Snapshot Saturday”

A traditional woodsman back at camp after a morning duck hunt.

With one wood duck drake to show for the morning’s effort, the post hunter returns to duck camp on a pleasant October morning. Old Northwest Territory, one ridge east of the headwaters of the River Raisin, in the Year of our Lord, 1792…

Posted in Duck hunts, Snapshot Saturday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “End of the Morning Hunt”

A Tenant of the Forest Will Die

“A doe came through while you were gone,” Tami whispered as I sat cross-legged behind her trying to keep my shadow one with hers. A wool blanket, which broke up her shape, hung from her shoulders. A Chiefs-grade, smooth-bored trade gun lay across her buckskin dress. The air “smelled of fall,” as she so often says.

Reaching into the split pouch, I discovered the pencil’s lead end, the good one, broke during that morning’s still-hunt. Pulling the butcher knife, I scraped black dust from the blunt end that extended beyond the lead-holder’s tarnished brass jaws—all hidden on my lap, behind Tami’s blanket. In the distance, geese ke-honked as they rose from the River Raisin. Satisfied with the point, I slipped the knife into its leather sheath with care and began scribbling my wife’s words on a folded paper retrieved from the pouch…

A lady of the forest watches the meadow trail.“There’s six fox squirrels out. Two over there, two to the right and two up in the big oak with the broken branch,” my wife continued, indicating the directions with subtle movements of “The Silver Cross’” muzzle.

“The doe was right there, maybe fifteen steps away. She was upwind. Had no idea I was here. Thought a buck might follow, but not yet,” she whispered with a hint of excitement. Twenty-seven geese flew overhead, a wedge and a line, gabbing as they swished in steady rhythm above the sunlit meadow that was to our backs.

We both kept our eyes on the shadow-laden, hardwood-covered hill that slopes gentle, then drops off steep until it washes out into the big swamp. The hill’s break was eighty paces distant, angling away from the heavy, furrowed trunk of a stately red-cedar tree that offered limited cover. On that fine November morn, in the Year of our Lord, 1798, Tami watched to the northwest, I to the northeast. I could see the meadow’s knoll, she the trail that led into the cedar grove.

“Jay! Jay! Jay! Jay! Jay!” Three blue jays hollered in unison as two fox squirrels chased in the brown leaves, then spiraled up an average oak. Not a minute later, a glimpse of white moved uphill from the sharp crest. Her trade gun’s walnut butt raised up a bit as she shifted her body to the right. A second flick of white trailed the first. “A clean kill, or a clean miss. Your will, O Lord,” I mouthed in silence.

The eight-point’s creamy tines were unmistakable. We had watched this buck chase does in the meadow several times in October. Without making a sound, Tami’s right thumb brought The Silver Cross’ black English flint to attention. The trade gun’s butt disappeared under the blanket folds. Head up, the buck advanced, the doe ten paces ahead and walking fast. My right eye peered around the trade blanket. I dared not move.

From where I sat, the doe disappeared in a clump of cedars and the antlers soon followed. I glimpsed only heads and ears and an occasional beam. Tami straightened her posture as The Silver Cross found its rightful place against her shoulder. An 18th-century moment of truth was at hand…

The Importance of Duplicating Results

“I can’t hold the gun up any longer,” Tami whispered. “I’ve got to let it down.”

“Do you still see the buck?”

“No, he followed the doe. They both walked away some time ago,” she said. Noticeable disappointment filled her voice. “I thought he would come back, but he hasn’t yet. He was just too far away for a good shot.”

We sat quiet for a while. The eight-point never came back. About a half-hour later, suspecting the morning activity was at an end, our whispers centered on that buck. Although I lost sight of him at the cedar clump, Tami’s vantage point allowed her to watch the two deer move beyond the cedars and walk off to the southwest, offering a quartering-away shot for a few seconds. As we talked in short, choppy sentences, she pointed out the four trees, selected at first light, which marked the outer boundary of her perceived effective distance.

Unlike re-enacting daily fort life or a significant frontier incident for spectators and onlookers, the objective of any history-based hunt is the taking of wild game—a living creature, a tenant of the forest, will die. Such business demands respectful, serious intent. To that end, the woodsman must know the extent of his or her own abilities, the limitations of the arm he or she chooses, and the constraints or influences imposed by the terrain itself in order to affect a quick, clean and humane harvest.

Addressing that second point, the living historian has an obligation to acquire and possess an acceptable level of proficiency with his or her chosen arm—in our case, 18th-century, smooth-bored, flintlock trade guns. Further, faced with the ultimate moment of truth in the wilderness setting, the traditional hunter must strive to live within the limitations dictated by a chosen technology of long ago. I simply cannot emphasize enough the importance of hands-on range practice, not just to gain a rudimentary skill level, but also to maintain and improve one’s prowess.

On that November deer hunt, my wife began her hunt by picking a series of trees to act as markers of the outer limits of her effective distance with The Silver Cross. If a buck walked on her side of a given cedar tree, she felt comfortable taking a shot; if the buck stood beyond that cedar she planned to let it walk.

In the last couple of years, I have spent extensive time learning how to load my Northwest gun in a “period-correct” manner using natural wadding. I have an orange file folder full of round ball targets and three armfuls of rolled brown-paper pattern-board tests. A separate file holds notes from those experiences, plus interviews with other long-time smoothbore shooters.

This research project has produced some interesting data and a lot of new friendships. In addition, my questions have sparked an exchange of information, good, bad and downright unsafe. It seems a week doesn’t go by that someone doesn’t send me an email or call with a lead or a link to a new source of smoothbore shooting information.

Of late, most of these sources have dealt with shooting the Long-Land Pattern Brown Bess. One writer, a history professor I believe, concluded that the arm was totally inaccurate after a dozen shots taken on the range by an individual who had never fired a flintlock prior to that shooting session.

Another lengthy treatise included graphs, distribution curves and data charts for a .715-inch round ball fired from a Brown Bess recorded in yardage increments out to 200 yards. In questioning this data, I found a number of living history web sites that linked to this gentleman’s report. It appears his “findings” are considered the authoritative source of Brown Bess ballistic information. From the opening introduction, the writer left the impression that these were actual fired-on-the-range test results based on specific loads.

I was ecstatic, convinced I could extrapolate information that would help me better understand “Old Turkey Feathers,” my 20-guage trade gun. I spent an entire evening breaking down the charts. The next night I searched for similar ballistic data for a 20-guage round ball. Late that evening I returned to a chart that compared trajectories for a number of muzzle velocities. I re-read the supporting statement. But my heart sank when I discovered the “Remember that this is theoretical data…” disclaimer. In my excitement I read right over that statement, as I’m sure others have. The entire “study” appears to be based on computer generated ballistic data.

And please don’t get me started on the multitude of YouTube videos produced by “experts” explaining how to shoot a smoothbore. I click off the minute the individual mentions this is a first time shooting experience, when the loading sequence explanation is filled with false “fur trade lore” or fails to follow accepted safe loading practices (like the fellow who fills his measure from an open can, sets the can on the bench and then fires from behind the loading bench), the target grouping is too good to be true, or it is clear the individual is not a regular smoothbore shooter. The exception is the gun-guys who show their “field tests” and state up front that they lack experience and expertise.

On the one hand, traditional black powder hunters base their living history simulations on the best available primary documentation—the printed word, period illustrations and existing artifacts. That is the gold standard in the hobby. But on the other, there seems to be a willingness to accept the shooting recommendations of anyone who can get their name in print or their face in front of a camera. This disconnect totally baffles me.

When it comes to the Northwest gun, I seek consistent, verifiable results that can be duplicated over and over, either with Old Turkey Feathers or a similar smooth-bored arm, using similar loads, under similar conditions. This is the essence of the wilderness classroom experience—hands-on laboratory experimentation in a somewhat controlled woodland environment.

A young lady firing a Jacob Dickert-style flintlock rifle.

My daughter Kathryn firing a Jacob Dickert-style, .40-caliber flintlock rifle.

When I go to the range, I have a plan for that session. In the case of the natural wadding tests, the plan is ongoing, carried out in small increments—corn leaves one evening, wide bladed grass another, then narrow-bladed grass, etc..

The purpose of these laboratory lessons is to attempt to produce sufficient data to draw conclusions, discover the limitations associated with natural-wadded loads and also to compare the accuracy attained with that of the best competitive loads. But the overriding question remains the same, “Can these results be duplicated?”

The other night I spoke with a long-time trade gun shooter and competitor. I asked pointed questions that some match shooters might think crossed the line into the secret side of paper punching—the area where the individual is reluctant to share his or her experience for fear of giving a potential foe a competitive advantage.

As is almost always the case, Ed shared his knowledge freely, both as it applies to the range and when engaged in the simple pursuit of wild game. Although he shoots a 28-guage trade gun, his expectations paralleled mine, as did his results with both round ball and bird shot. I found it fascinating that the groupings he got at the different distances matched mine, but he is not the only smoothbore shooter I have interviewed, and all report similar results and expectations.

Over the course of our conversation, he laid out a clear, easy-to-follow methodology, interspersed with the caveat: “This is what works in my gun…” His statements were based on thousands of rounds. No doubt, anyone with a 28-guage trade gun could use his loading process and duplicate his results, aside from peculiarities attributable to a specific muzzleloading smoothbore and personal marksmanship ability.

So, for the history professor, the re-enactor who has fired a mere handful of rounds and the YouTubers who just bought a Northwest trade gun, I raise the same questions: “Are the results you present based on extensive testing? Are the results consistent and verifiable? Can your results be duplicated over and over with a similar smooth-bored arm, using similar loads, under similar conditions?”

You see, as a traditional black powder hunter my 18th-century sojourn is not the same as re-enacting with powder loads; Old Turkey Feathers’ point of aim is not based on theoretical data; and the white-tailed buck standing forty-paces distant is not an assemblage of pixels on a screen. The business of this traditional woodsman is serious, yet undertaken in a respectful manner. If taken to its ultimate conclusion, a tenant of the forest will die.

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Deer Hunts, Research, Safety | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

“December Venison”

“Snapshot Saturday”

Traditional hunter Nik Woods with a fine 5-point buck.

Traditional woodsman Nik Woods supplied a photo of himself and a fine 5-point buck taken with a .50-caliber rifle of his own making. Old Northwest Territory, two-day’s travel west of Lake Huron, late 18th-century. Nik Woods photo used with permission.

Posted in Deer Hunts, Snapshot Saturday | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on “December Venison”

I Choose to Invest the Time

Two whistling swans angled southeast. A raspy hen turkey yelped in time with the swans’ whooshing wings. In the distance, a single deer, modest in size, circled the largest cedar tree on the meadow’s north edge. No others followed on that first day in November, in the Year of our Lord, 1798.

Wet soil stuck to the toe of a trail-worn, buffalo-hide moccasin. A quick, soaking rain an hour before first light softened the edges of a fine buck’s track that crossed the cornfield in haste, east to west. The Northwest gun’s tarnished brass butt plate rested on two, wide, crisscrossed corn leaves that covered the bare earth at the tip of the clean moccasin.

A returned Native captive hunter peer from behind a row of cornstalks.At first light, the sky remained devoid of wild Canada geese. Damp corn leaves fluttered in the gentle breeze, but made nary a sound. The air smelled fresh and clean, spring-like, with a twinge of sweetness. Orange and red clouds ushered in that morning. Three small family groups of decoys surrounded a tiny stand of corn on the crest of a hill not that far from the cornfield’s center.

Six Sandhill cranes chortled their way to the mill pond in the village. The flock disappeared behind the tree line, but came back into view where Goose Creek flows into the River Raisin. The birds seemed unsure, flapping soft and easy farther north, then turning east and finally south until they reached the point where they first became visible. Wings cupped, beaks into the wind, the six settled down in the hayfield to the west of the neighbor’s homestead.

A while later, two Sandhills approached, but in contrast to the flock of six, these birds swooped low over the cornfield, taking a good look at the imitation geese that fed near the standing corn. The pair winged slow over the cedar grove, turned and came back. The sun illuminated the red and white on the one’s head; their wings and body plumage almost glowed as they banked to land.

The sum total of excitement that morning was watching those Sandhill cranes land, seeing the whistling swans and catching the young white-tailed deer sneak around a cedar tree. An hour or so after daylight, a flock of wild turkeys walked single file through the middle of the meadow. I wondered why I wasn’t sitting beneath the dead oak. Instead, I chose to hunt geese, hidden amongst one hundred and two cornstalks. I counted, twice. But as some days go, I never heard nor saw a wild goose.

An All Too Common Conversation

“You just hunt deer with your muzzleloader, right?” I had the gentleman on speaker phone as I searched a folder looking for a telephone number.

“No, I do all my hunting with a Northwest gun, a smooth-bored flintlock. It’s the 18th-century equivalent of today’s shotgun.”

“I don’t understand, I thought muzzleloaders were just for deer hunting?”

“Here’s the phone number…” I said in response to the reason for the gentleman’s call.

Now I could have stopped there. I knew the explanation for his last question would evolve into a longer discussion. It always does. Without a second thought, I chose to invest the time.

“When I started out in traditional black powder hunting, my main motivation was to hunt deer. But I was an upland bird and small game hunter, too,” I continued. “I looked into a smoothbore, because of its versatility. I learned I could load with bird shot or a round ball. I use bismuth shot for waterfowl and buckshot for bobcats and coyotes.

“If you called me up and said, ‘Denny, do you want to come over tomorrow and hunt squirrels, or rabbits, or ducks or whatever…’ I would show up with ‘Old Turkey Feathers,’ as I call my Northwest gun; the correct projectiles, fixings and accoutrements; and dressed in the hunting clothes of the 1790s,” I said.

“Really? I love to hunt small game and sometimes ducks. I never knew you could hunt them with a muzzleloader,” he said with that inquisitive tone that typifies an “Ah, Ha” moment. The conversation continued, but I hesitate to say, “As you might expect…”

At the Woods-N-Water News Outdoor Weekend last September in Imlay City, Michigan, I had a similar conversation with a quest who turned out to be a fellow living historian. He said he re-enacts a British soldier, if I recall correctly, in the American War for Independence. The gentleman owned a reproduction Brown Bess musket, which seems to be at the center of a number of other discussions lately.

Anyway, as we talked, he told me how many “rounds” he had fired through his musket, and that number was quite respectable. Then he balked when I asked him if he hunted deer or turkey with his Brown Bess or perhaps small game.

“This summer was the first time I ever shot a round ball,” he said in a matter-of-fact way. “Not a lot, just a few, but it was a lot of fun. I’m looking forward to deer hunting in December. How do you hunt small game with a Brown Bess?”

Re-enactors defending Frenchtown during the War of 1812.

War of 1812 re-enactors at the Battle of Frenchtown.

This is the very reason I hesitate to say, “As you might expect…” Just because a person visits this site does not mean he or she is a traditional black powder hunter. This might surprise some, but to the contrary, the majority of viewers/readers do not participate in history-based pursuits; most are casual observers intrigued by the unique nature of this hobby.

In recent years I have discovered that a fair number of seasoned living historians, especially individuals who do battle re-enactments and hunt with modern arms, do not connect hunting with their front-loading musket or rifle, and fewer still consider doing so “in character.”

And I have found this to be true of many black powder shooting sports competitors, including those who favor the primitive events. This all too common conversation popped up again last evening when I spoke with a long-time rifle shooter. Our exchange was almost a word for word copy of the “You just hunt deer…” question.

From the sounds of his description, he owns a pretty decent 18th-century wardrobe, has done the research and takes pride in his longhunter impression—on the primitive range. As we talked, he sounded dumbfounded that anyone would consider bringing game to the table in period garb. He uses his percussion rifle in Michigan’s muzzleloading deer season, but wears modern hunting clothes. He had never considered taking his longhunter impression to its ultimate conclusion, and found the notion fascinating. It was obvious he had not read any of my scribblings.

On that November morning, I chose to hunt geese over turkeys with what some might consider disappointing results. Granted, if I weighed geese over squirrel hunting, I’m sure a herd of fat fox squirrels, each the size of a woodchuck, would have frolicked in the corn, just beyond Old Turkey Feathers’ effective distance. That’s just the nature of these simple pursuits, mine at least. Don’t get me wrong, I had a great time, as I always do.

But now when I retell the tales about traveling back in time to my beloved Eden near the headwaters of the River Raisin, I keep an open ear to the comments of those following along vicariously. Each inquisitive look or outright query represents an opportunity to expound upon the virtues of this glorious pastime—traditional black powder hunting.

From the outset, I know the explanation will take time. It always does. But without a second thought, I choose to invest the time, and I urge my fellow traditional black powder hunters to invest their time, too. I believe the dividends will be worth the effort.

Explain the virtues traditional black powder hunting offers, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Goose Hunts, Worth thinking about... | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

“Roasting Venison Ribs”

“Snapshot Saturday”

Two racks of venison ribs roasting over an open fire.

Two racks of venison ribs slow-roast over an open fire. Nothing else need be said… Late 18th century, Swamp Hollow in the Old Northwest Territory.

Posted in Hunting Camps, Snapshot Saturday | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Portage Collar “How-To” Added

A leather portage collar coiled on a trade blanket.Portage collars, hoppis straps and carrying strings garner passing mention in the journals of many 18th-century hunter heroes. Some describe their pack straps, others refer to them in name only and are content to leave it at that.

I recently made a leather portage collar for my daughter, and I documented the process in response to a number of requests from loyal readers for a “do-it-yourself” article on the subject. A brief discussion of burden straps, “Sorting Through the Confusion,” is posted under the “How-to” category. This is by no means a comprehensive treatise on burden straps, but perhaps it will stimulate some positive discussion. A separate page with a step-by-step construction guide for making your own leather portage collar is included for your enjoyment.

Give traditional black powder hunting a try, be safe and may God bless you.

Posted in Clothing & Accoutrements | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Portage Collar “How-To” Added